QUOTE(lexylady @ Jul 20 2006, 10:14 PM) [snapback]368124[/snapback]
QUOTE(wheels-inmotion.co.uk @ Jul 20 2006, 08:55 AM) [snapback]367866[/snapback]
QUOTE(lexylady @ Jul 19 2006, 05:32 PM) [snapback]367703[/snapback]
your message has proved what I have always believed... you lot are obsessed with geometry checks as the be all and end all, and this just shows that you need to realise this tyre wear is a basic design fault to put it in a nutshell. my tyres has gone the same way from brand new on a brand new car - and your post has proved that it still happens with correct goemetry!!
face it lads it is one of the (very few) downsides of owning a lexus!!

Nothing wrong being obsessed with saving money and possibly your life.... As MacRS200 said Lexus did get it wrong Geometrically...not by much but nevertheless wrong. The wim set-up has proved successful...every car that comes to me has a problem hence the appointment and every car re-positioned has been fine thereafter, those positions i have made public so i am not trying to capture the recovery market only the awareness market. The situation with rhoseigr's car is indeed unusual but now he has an image of the geometry any future wear can be 'fine-tuned out' this practice is necessary since we are all unique so the positions can only represent a suggestion.
I must say, i was astonished to see that my tyres wore so badly, I did not even realise because if was the inner edges which you just dont see at all easily, they told me on my first service and i had not driven millions of miles etc. The only point i was trying to make was that the guy starting this post went to drury lane diagnostics, who he felt knew what they were talking about, and they told him his geo was within suitable limits........ yet he was there because of this adverse wear, which seems to show that it is not necessarily, or only, caused by wrong geometry. From what I have read here, it is a common prob with lexus. I take on board what you say here about wrong set up by lexus. I have not done anything about mine, as i did not really know what could be done, but my second set of tyres have not gone the same way.... mind you i will try to have a really good look at the inside edges tomorrow.....

I understand your post and the comment about rhosneigr's camber being within tolerance, but the tolerance is one of the main problems..... this is why?
IS200 Front camber position 'static' is -30' The front camber 'Tolerance' is actually the dynamic range?...so when the wheel hits a bump the camber can curve to -1 degree 15' then off the bump relax to +15'. On the machine these positions would be displayed 'GREEN' implying the positions are ok.
So your car can have nsf camber at -1 degree 15' and osf at +15' (visibly / / ) and be considered ok

The dynamic range serves no relevance to geometry recovery unless you are a mechanical engineer.... The only facts needed are what is the positions now, and what should they be 'static'.......