QUOTE(djanderso @ Nov 25 2003, 09:54 AM)
Mmm, I guess the biggest risk with the Nissan is potential poor residual values. I must be the only person on the planet that doesn't like the RX-8. I think it's yet another Mazda rip-off design - looks too much like a Honda S2000 at the front and back for my liking.
You cannot be serious!
The Nissan replaces a classic!
Are you sure you have the right car? The S2000 looks nothing like the Mazda. In fact nothing looks like the Mazda!
Top Gear didn't compare the RX-8 with Nissan but Fifth Gear did. VBH said "I really like this car" and was 4s ahead of the new 250bhp Audi TT
Needell said: "... whilst the reliability of the engine may have been proven,...notably those emissions, ..poor fuel consumption...and a lack of torque for low down acceleration..yet I could forgive it all of that because of this: 9500 revs. Two models are available 190bhp which no-one will want and ... much more useful 230bhp...Yet ...less than 2/3 torque of ...350Z and does 6mpg less than Audi ...Bizarrely, the high power model has less torque than it's baby brother so it really does need the extra 2000 revs and the extra six speed in the gear box...Good seats. Good driving position. Nice steering wheel...interior sharp styling...Rear wheel drive with a traction control an option, the handling is very good, if somewhat on the soft side...more audi than nissan but the steering feels much better than the German opposition and the gear box one of the best..but no MX-5 in the handling department... genuine 4 seater £22000... £5K cheaper than the audi and £2k less than the nissan.