Do Not Sell My Personal Information Jump to content


Uphill/downhill Fuel Consumption


Recommended Posts

Living as I do in a hilly area, I constantly notice that my 300h's fuel consumption


increases quite substantially during stretches of uphill driving. While this is not in


itself unusual, I am nevertheless puzzled by the distances the car subsequently


requires in order to revert to the original rates of consumption. These distances,


which may be downhill or on the flat or, more usually, combinations thereof, are


in my experience at least two or three times longer than the uphill ones, but they


include so many variables in terms of gradients, curves, use of brakes, EV-mode


etc., etc. that it is impossible to make meaningful comparisons.



Does anyone know of a mathematical formula which enables a driver to estimate,


all other things being equal, how far he needs to travel downhill in order to regain


what he lost going uphill? And if any such formula exists, does it also apply the


other way around? Namely, how far uphill will you expect to have driven before


losing the saving obtained from the preceding downhill stretch?



All this may sound academic, and it probably is, but I am nagged by the thought


that better knowledge of the subject could point the way to improved driving


technique and economy in the types of area in question.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I do know that E=MC2 but that's it.

This is not meant to be a serious reply because you lost me half way through. You could find a job and a house in a valley or just drive and enjoy your car. Sorry to be no more help but this site needs to lighten up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard:


My sincere apologies for losing you halfway through my over-heavy post. I guess you must be one of the


few 300h owners who do not look at the consumption figures in front of you. I admit I once turned them off


for a whole day but the resulting loss of mental energy did not make me enjoy driving the car any better. I


promise to throw a few jokes into any future post.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is I've halved my petrol bill, and the car is cracking fun to drive.

I achieved a grade 1 CSE in maths when God was a boy, so can't help with the formula stuff.

Sent from my Iphone using Lexus OC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi lucky IS300h owners :)

This post is a big IMHO

The way it works is that you loose energy going up as well as going down. This is due to friction, air resistance, engine heat etc. When you are going up hill you are fighting against gravity, while down hill gravity is helping you .In most cases the car is driven hard going uphill in higher revs, where engine efficiency is at its lowest. Thus energy losses are high. Going downhill you are still loosing energy, so not able to recover 100% of energy lost going up.

This is not a hard fact but I think in normal condition it would take twice or more of going downhill to normalize the mpg to compensate for the uphill struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


When you go up hill you can see how poor the mpg is, maybe 20 mpg or less, and that will quickly bring down your mpg average for the tank of fuel.

At best, if you when you got to the top of the hill you turned around and rolled all the way back using no petrol your average going up/down the hill would be 40 mpg. That is probably still way lower than your tank average of 50+ and will take some time to recover that long running average consumption figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, just gone through the roper article......................Not to sure but I think it explains why consumption increases a lot quicker than decreases, so drops to 45ish on a long hill but takes ages to recover back to 50ish. :driving:

Nearly 6 weeks use now and find it jolly good. I suppose an average of 50 to 50.5 is ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RunningInPleasePass:



Thanks for providing the "hillydriving" link. As correctly imagined by DJP my delight upon its perusal knew no


bounds even if I would have preferred something a little less rich by way of breakfast reading. Nevertheless,


having fully digested the piece along with my cornflakes, I approached my 300h with a purposeful mien and


spring in my step and drove off in search of the nearest hill where I could test the accuracy of the equations


and, hopefully, further consolidate the almost mystical bond between man and machine. I regret to report


that my findings were inconclusive, and that, notwithstanding the yearnings of an eager public, I will never publish them.



Seriously, I was interested to see that someone somewhere (actually the former Head of Physics at Virginia


Tech) has devoted a heavy piece of thought to the subject. As for myself, it merely crossed my mind that


possible adjustments to everyday driving techniques (even for those of us who live in valleys but frequently


have to drive up and down the sides of them) could narrow the large disparities of fuel consumption in


stretches of hill driving and therefore maybe enable greedy people like me to squeeze an extra few km


out of the tank of what, in the case of the 300h, is already a very economic car.



Since starting this Topic, I have seen that it has been raised at least once before in this Forum quite recently, when I must have missed it: see Tips for Mountain Driving, started by Dochybrid on June 10, 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On a serious note there are now far too many distractions from the actual art of driving. Using a hand held mobile is illegal while driving, at some time in the future I believe it will also be illegal to use and operate all these extra features which do distract your attention from driving. I am guilty of this my to the annoyance of my wife and I am a techno novice compared to some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richard1200:



We are finally in agreement about something. Yes, the amount and nature of the data the 300h constantly puts in front of you is a distraction from the art (in my own case the simple act) of driving. The consumption


data in their several variant forms always prompts me to respond with mental arithmetic of my own with an


obvious loss of concentration on more important things such as the actions of pedestrians and other drivers.


When I add to this the temptation to unnecessarily fiddle with the navi, audio and ventilation systems, I get


a feeling of nostalgia for the sardine-can technology of the Citroen 2cv which was the first car I owned many


decades ago. But on the other hand I suppose we have only ourselves to blame if we are the victims of an


excess of technology, and it would be hypocritical of me to say otherwise.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



×
×
  • Create New...