Do Not Sell My Personal Information Jump to content


Saul.Lex

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • First Name
    Saul
  • Lexus Model
    GS450H
  • Year of Lexus
    2006
  • UK/Ireland Location
    Essex

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Saul.Lex's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. On the warranty document it says: MOT Protected Part Each mechanical and electrical part of the Protected Vehicle listed in Clause 5.7 all front and rear suspension shock absorbers is covered: Then this: 5.2 We will not pay for the cost of repairing or replacing any MOT Protected Part that suffers a Mechanical or Electrical Failure as a result of wear and tear or corrosion. is excessive leak, wear and tear?
  2. Dear Team, I have a service plan, Lexus warranty and today my car went for a MOT but failed on "near side rear shock absorbers, excessive leak". Lexus Warranty refusing to cover it as they its wear & tear. Cost £700 + Has anyone had this covered by the warranty? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
  3. Yes, i intend to do this and may go far as the Ombudsman too. Will keep you posted. Thank you for your help
  4. Thank you John, I have the document and I agree, I see the same. You know, the document clearly defines wear & tear items as "consumable items" (4.1 e) If that is the case headlight adjusters are not consumable items. I forgot to mention that they sent an independent engineer to visit and he said that wear & tear caused the headlight adjusters to stop working. I guess that still doesn't make a valid reason for refusal as its not a consumable item, or does it?
  5. I don't see any examples on the warranty document. What page do you see this on?
  6. Hi guys, Lexus extend warranty refused to pay for headlight adjusters saying it was wear & tear. I thought such items were supposed to last for the life of the vehicle. Has anyone else had their headlight adjusters repaired or replaced under warranty? Thank you
  7. Do you think the dealer had a part to play in this? Is it because you think they could have done more for me yesterday? £700 is a very expensive experience. :) I was thinking of getting rid off the Lexus because of this warranty. Is there any industry guidelines as to what is wear & tear for certain parts?
  8. HI Jon, any bad experience with them with the warranty? I am grateful to Lee who helped solve the problem today, by putting the claim in again.
  9. Yes, 4.2. Thank you for the clarification. The headlight adjuster incident happened in November 2014. Do you think I can still raise that? They sent an independent engineer who said it wear & tear and based on that they refused it. I agree Shahpor that wear & tear items should mean everyday items, i.e brakes, etc. But I am shocked how they have treated me with the hybrid battery (now resolved) and having to pay for the headlight adjuster. The excuse they use its the age and mileage. Thinking in the future would I need to find out the lifespan of a certain part to get my claim covered.
  10. Thank you Shahpor, It was a shocker yesterday when they refused it. I think they are trying it on. I also realise the warranty is provided by TWG - http://www.thewarrantygroup.com/ and not Lexus. Do you think headlight adjusters should be covered under the warranty? There is no clear definition what wear & tear is and what is mechanical failure. How do you prove that? I also see a clause in their T&C and worried they might use this if I have any future claims as my car is over 10 years. (e) The repair or replacement of any Protected Part has not suffered a Mechanical or Electrical Failure.
  11. Guys, I have this sorted now. Spoke to warranty company in the moring - they still refused saying its wear & tear, mileage and age of vehicle. Also refused to except the point that - battery should last as long as the life of the vehicle . I then spoke to the dealer who put the claim in again to say it was not wear and tear but electrical failure and luckily they approved. I am shocked how Lexus warranty could do this. I am now concerned if they will use this wear & tear excuse every time as my car is 10 years old and 113k in mileage? Is there any point me having the warranty? Last time they refused to cover headlight adjuster saying it was wear & tear and cost me £700 to replace. I brought warranty from Lexus expecting better service rather than any other 3rd party warranty. Guys, thank you for your support during the past 24 hours, I am grateful for your kindness.
  12. Yes FLSH. On a service plan. Paying main dealer service prices so the warranty stays active. and now...... what can i say........
×
×
  • Create New...