DeckerUK

Breaker

Don't know to what depth, but hasn't this been discussed before, about sub-dividing the IS sub forum into old and new IS. Maybe a poll to the members, would find out if it was required/desired or not.

That's the only problem with modding (pimping ) it's as good as lost money. The number of potential buyers is reduced to those who have the same taste. You only have to look at what peeps sell their bits for on here - fraction of the cost new

Muff

My, my, my, what can i say. I can't believe people have taken this so personally. Haven't been able to log on since midday yesterday and bu**ery, missed all the whining last night cos of it. Currently stuck in CDG airport after missing connecting flight due to Air France having the continious ability to delay flights and not give a t*ss - 8hrs in this sh*t hole. Listen peeps, if you want to stick something in - post it - then let the banter and jovial abuse begin - it could be a lot worse than not being personally asked - you could get 5 days leave then have to spend one of them in a fri**ing french airport. CHILL OUT PEEPS :P @ aido From what i've read of your posts in the past, it doesn't take a lot Dek

As previously said, by myself and tdiplc, legal arrangements are made between WIM and the other party so that the copyright transfers to WIM, in exchange for cash, sevices or whatever. If this is adhered to then there is no further problem, if it doesn't work out and no agreement can be reached then Tony goes another way. If the legalities are sorted, what's the problem? I would have thought that the joint venture being undertaken would have had some legal intervention anyway..... but i may be wrong. Dek

That was my thoughts, but it MUST be made clear that the copyright becomes the property of WIM. Right embarrassed now guys

If someone does decide to do something sensible then I would have thought that some sort of lawful agreemnet could be sorted between WIM and the individual as regards copyright ownership I wasn't talking so much about copying previously copyrighted designs, rather the matter of who would own the copyright on the proposed WIM design - the designer or WIM? Full agreement, as previous, that would have to be a legality prior to it's use. The parties would have to come to a mutual agreement.

Well, secondhand supercharger money, anyways :winky:

You are probably right Maybe one of the members has some experience of copyright law It's way too complex for me though:duh: but I would have thought that as long as you don't knowingly copy anything that has previously been published it would be ok. If someone does decide to do something sensible then I would have thought that some sort of lawful agreemnet could be sorted between WIM and the individual as regards copyright ownership Maybe i'm talking through my ar*e, and should stick to what I do know :P

Yeah, sounds about right :P

Tout

:D My weedy effort - gotta use the Alexis font, it's a must, Oh, and it's blue :P I await the abuse

Meal