Do Not Sell My Personal Information Jump to content


Spandex Sidney

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Tutorials

Lexus Owners Club

Gold Membership Discounts

Lexus Owners Club Video

News & Articles

Posts posted by Spandex Sidney

  1. Hi Dave,

    The 400 v 430 debate is a long and tricky one and boils down to YOUR personal preference. However, on balance I would say that the 400 probably edges the debate based on people moving to 430's and then moving back to 400's again.

    I believe the 400 was the best Lexus ever made. The accountants moved in with the 430. For example, compare the leather on a 430 v the leather on your 400. The 400 leather is much better quality.

    The 430 is marginally quicker but noisier and has lots more toys (and lots more to therefore go wrong if you only see ventilated seats as nothing more than a novelty).

    I wouldn't worry about the LPG thing, the cost benefit of that will be based on your using the car. I am personally against LPG on such a magnificent engineered machine but again that personal choice. Having said that it would take me at least 5 years to get my money back on it and what if I totalled the car, the insurance wouldn't pay me that money back.

    I have a GS430 and with the 4.3 engine cambelt is everything. A snapped cambelt on a 4.0 is about 400 quid to fix, a snapped cambelt on 4.3 is a new engine. And yes I do know someone this happened to, on a SC430, 15000 miles after the belt was 'replaced' and documented by a 'specialist'.

    Bottom line, your choice, but make sure you test the 430 first, it has a hard act to follow and remember that Toyota pumped endless development money into the 400 but the 430 was a stopgap to appease the yanks.

  2. Interesting debate. I tend to spend money on my cars so I am happy with the higher mileage (with a FSH), cheaper car as I will spend whatever it needs to get it back to as near to A1 as possible.

    I still don't by the 'out of the showroom' argument though. A car standing around in all weathers, never driven would be an absolute pig after 15 years of that punishment with the odometer on '0'.

    I guess it comes from my previous life as a Jag enthusiast, I have had a V12 XJS, 4.0 XJ40, Series 3 Daimler Double 6, Daimler 250 and a massive Jaguar 420G and when I bought all of them they were mechanically much better for having regular mixed use on motorways and backroads, the 'concours' cars I saw at shows looked lovely and were undriveable!

    Each to his own, I still say that put an average 150k miler next to an average 50k miler, both with FSH and I bet it would be hard to tell from the body and interior alone which was which.

    Thats how good these cars are. I wish Lexus made cars like this now!

  3. Interesting answer, I see the logic but if the cost difference between low and high mileage, both with full service history is Between £1000-£1500, that gives you up to 1500 quid to play with to get it exactly how YOU want it to be, plus you know for definite that things have been done properly.

    I still think the higher mileage, lower cost option is better for me, I have been driving since 1989 and I think the preference for lower mileage stems from the 'old fashioned' idea that petrol engines are only good for 100k miles.

    With these cars I would go for complete history over mileage every time.

  4. I am a big car fan, always have been and it looks like my fabled first 400 is on it's way (fingers crossed) to go with my GS 430.

    However, I do not see the fascination with low mileage cars? It would worry me that the engine hasn't been properly used and the cambelt hadn't been done.

    I haven't looked at any car with less than 100k on it. The interior of a looked after 180k miler won't be that different to a 70k miler, and has probably had the belt changed three times and lots more 'new' parts on it?

    Plus it will be half the price.

    My GS 430 has done 125k, belt done 20k ago, FSH and the interior is like NEW and it drives like it's new too. £1800 well spent, or £3000 for a 85k miler with no belt change? It was an easy decision for me.

    Is it just me that likes my cars 'lived in' a bit?!

×
×
  • Create New...