I have, but I'm none the wiser. Its 38" deep to the base of the seats, with them fully slid backards, 38" wide (between the arches) and 30" high at the aperture, but what I couldn't get a feel for was the rake of the rear screen with the boot lid closed, and I thought a forum member might have a bit more experience, OR be able to point me towards some diagrams which might help me.
I thought asking questions was the point of a car forum. I must have misunderstood. Sorry.
Oh, and I only had chance to look at one with a nasty beige interior. Does the trim in the darker versions look less plasticy?
Hi,
I don't think so, even in dark trim the interior is really pants! I currently drive an IS200 and thought about upgrading to a RX350 but I really don't like the interior. Way too many buttons and the overall look is very American. The new IS and GS interiors are miles apart.
I'm now looking at the Nissan Pathfinder, reliable, spacious, loads of kit and a much nicer interior!
Cheers,
Rob
Cheers...
Its not that I'm against Japanese cars. I've had 2 Audis in my last 3 cars, but the middle car was a 350z, and everyone who doesn't like that car whinges about how naff and plastic the interior is, but I thought it was fine...
Its just I was looking closely at the rear airvents, and the weird cubby in the front armrest with the pivoting doors, and wasn't fussed on the finish AT ALL. The rear DVD screen integration looked OK, but the front seats felt a bit small.
I've just been to look at a Touareg... I had seen photos and thought the interior of THAT looked quite bad, but up close it was much better than the RX400h. Maybe the dashboard plastic was of a similar "quality" but the all-round feel of the Touareg interior was much more plush. That's a shame, and not what I expected in the Lexus vs VW.
It seems Lexus have put all the money into the technology and drivetrain and have skimped elsewhere. :(