Do Not Sell My Personal Information Jump to content


Stuno1

Established Member
  • Posts

    3,353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Tutorials

Lexus Owners Club

Gold Membership Discounts

Lexus Owners Club Video

News & Articles

Posts posted by Stuno1

  1. 33 minutes ago, Comedian said:

    Not heard but my guess would be at least +10k over the normal one. Not sure how long it will take to drop to 30k like you are waiting for on carbon models. By the time it does...... there will be another car you like better anyway 😁

    Haha! 35k to be fair 😘

    https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201812053009690?advertising-location=at_cars&year-from=2009&maximum-mileage=30000&price-to=45000&postcode=cm29pa&model=RC F&page=1&make=LEXUS&onesearchad=New&onesearchad=Nearly New&onesearchad=Used

  2. 20 minutes ago, B1RMA said:

    I couldn't agree more, I wish Lexus every success with this car. I think it's fair to say that the RCF isn't that good on track (the Chris Harris youtube confirms this) and to make it any good it needed a drastic re-think/re-work not what I think we have here and that's to put it very bluntly/truthfully a few cosmetic tweaks.

    I like the RCF as a road car at which it's rather good, again Chris Harris concluded that too.

    With this and the new Supra getting criticised for it's looks etc I wonder if Toyota/Lexus have lost their way a bit.

    If the figure of 457 BHP is correct the power to weight ratio is 3 BHP more that the standard RCF.

    Oh and that red interior.

    Indeed. Not enough for a GT car. Reduced sound deadening, lighter windows, cf door cards etc all things I expected to shed the lbs. Banging on mega expensive lighter brakes is not enough and is actually something that will put many off. They are not condisive for daily driving. It is now not a proper track car you can daily or a daily car that smashes tracks. Misssed opportunity to expand the f brand.

  3. 1 hour ago, FTBBCVoodoo said:

    PH is the only article I have found that states power remains the same.

    Others are quoting 47xbhp

    I wonder if it's getting different outputs in the US compared to Europe.

     

    Aye and that’s 457bhp which is less than earlier ones due to changes in omission laws. On top of what I said I bet this costs much money as well. I was hoping for 500hp, increased torque, lighter wheels and exhaust, maybe an option to in tick rear seats, more carbon fibre to reduce weight and basically a more focused car. It’s more like a slightly lighter rcf with more expensive brakes which will cost a bloody fortune to replace. I don’t think it will attract a lot of customers. It will be faster around longer tracks due to aero but shorter circuits and to 60 ininagine about the same as the current car. I’d be amazed if it slips below 4 seconds to 60. Happy, but amazed. 

  4. 3 hours ago, FTBBCVoodoo said:

    Apparently....


    -472 hp 
    -395 ft. lbs. of torque, 
    -176 lbs lighter
    -19” BBS forged wheels
    -Brembo carbon ceramic brakes
    -functional carbon body parts incl. rear wing
    -0-60 in 3.9 seconds 
    -only available in matte Ultra White or matte Nebula Grey with red interior

    Really? PH article says 455 bhp I think and 80kg lighter. Bit dissapppibted. Expected more weight off and more power. Also, Carbon brakes.... imagine replacing those! Would cost a fortune. Look forward to reviews but disappointed so far. 

  5. 18 minutes ago, The-Acre said:

    Don't get me wrong, I love mechanical watches, particularly skeleton watches, the working movement fascinates me.  We were in Switzerland in the spring (as part of our road trip) and my wife offered to buy me a Swiss made watch for my birthday.  What an idiot, I said no!  Still, at least my cracked face timepiece still just about works.

    Missed opportunity!!!! Madness. I am learning whenever such an offer is made grab it with both hands!

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...