keith bowler ??
Bazza (and others): the only person who could really name anyone in this kind of thread is LW himself... any third party naming (even in jest) could be misconstrued as libel, and I have seen other forums and their members raked over the coals for 3rd party naming of names in similar situations.
If LW choses not to name and shame in public, that's his perrogative (though I must admit, it would be entertaining if he did... especially entertaining reading any responses from the individual concerned, in this instance) -- it is, however, not on for others to attempt to publicly "fill in the blanks" to name the alleged culprit based on hearsay and innuendo... only LW can do that really.
If LW names the individual publicly, that's fine. Any third party attempting to name, even based on cryptic clues, hearsay, or innuendo runs the risk of implicating an innocent party (as has already been demonstrated here).
Leland