I have sometimes been that "bright spark", you so disparingly refer to.
I fail to see what is pointless, about highlighting an obviously poor history on a vehicle a member is considering buying.
Some advisories are a bit mickey mouse, plenty, like bald tyres, defective braking systems, for example, are indicative of neglect, surely something of interest to anybody considering a purchase?
Did you read the rest of this thread, does it not answer your question?
However, if you think it is of benefit, then feel free to carry on. For me personally, I see no value add in such random and subjective observations by MOT testers. It doesn't indicate poor history in any way, as is evident from this thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Lexus OC